The case number is CT-4094-20. The office of Jamita E. Swearengen, Circuit Court Clerk should have sent and/or should send the receipt of payment to the Plaintiff in the case.
The Plaintiff had conversations over the phone, on May 8, 2025, with an employee of the office in terms of the receipt. And the employee told him that she sent (or will send immediately) an email of the receipt to him.
The Plaintiff has waited that receipt for about 20(twenty) days. However, it did not arrive until May 28, 2025. The Plaintiff made several phone calls today on May 28, 2025. And it turned out that it was ‘extremely’ suspected that the office did not send it on purpose or intentionally.
Another employee told him that she sent another email of receipt today on May 28, 2025, but it was not discovered in the email account as of right now, either.
Has the office been playing game on purpose or intentionally? The office should have sent and/or should send the receipt unless it was and/or is involved in any kinds of serious allegations/possibilities/issues of XXXXX XXXXX.
Why couldn’t they send the receipt on purpose or intentionally?
The Editorial of the Memphis Times.
www.memphistimes.org
Published: May 28, 2025, Wednesday (5/28/2025), at 4:02P.M.